What an LT11 is
An LT11 is the letter the IRS must send before it can levy your wages, your bank account, or most other property. Its full title is the Final Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing, and the second half of that title is the part that matters.
The IRS's own summary of it is short: "We haven't received your payment for overdue taxes. We intend to seize your property or rights to property."
The letter exists because section 6330 of the tax code says no levy may be made until the IRS has notified you in writing of your right to a hearing, at least 30 days beforehand. The IRS sends this letter to discharge that obligation. Which means the letter you are holding is not primarily a threat. It is a notice of a right, in the envelope the threat came in.
The IRS issues the identical notice under several labels, and the label depends on which part of the IRS your file is in rather than on how bad your situation is. These are the four you are most likely to be holding:
| Label | Who sends it |
|---|---|
| LT11 | The automated collection system |
| Letter 1058 | A revenue officer — a person, assigned to your case |
| CP90 | The campus processing your individual account |
| CP297 | The campus processing a business account |
The rights are the same on all four. What differs is who you will be dealing with, and a Letter 1058 is worth reading differently for that reason alone.
Your clock
You have 30 days to request a Collection Due Process hearing, and the 30 days runs from the date printed on the notice. Not from the day you opened it, not from the day it was delivered.
This is the single most consequential detail on this page, and it is stated wrongly in a great deal of published material — usually as "30 days from when you receive it." The governing text is not ambiguous. Publication 1660, Collection Appeal Rights, says: "During the 30-day period from the date of the notice, you may request a hearing with Appeals." The regulation at 26 CFR 301.6330-1 runs the period from the day after the date of the CDP notice, and says plainly that actual receipt is not a prerequisite — a notice sent to your last known address starts the clock whether or not it reaches you.
Count from the date on the letter. If the two ever differ, counting from the letter is the earlier and safer of the two, and a person who follows it can never be late.
The request goes on Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process or Equivalent Hearing.
Sources: IRS Publication 1660; 26 CFR 301.6330-1; IRS, "Understanding your LT11 notice or letter 1058." Reviewed 27 August 2026.
What a hearing actually gets you — and what it costs
A Collection Due Process hearing is normally about the collection of the tax rather than about whether the tax is right. It happens in front of the IRS Independent Office of Appeals, and the practical thing it does is put a stop between you and a levy while somebody neutral looks at whether the collection action is appropriate and whether a less intrusive alternative would work.
There is one exception and it is the one worth checking. Section 6330(c)(2)(B) lets you raise the amount itself "if the person did not receive any statutory notice of deficiency for such tax liability or did not otherwise have an opportunity to dispute such tax liability." So if the balance came from a year you never knew was assessed, or from a return the IRS prepared on your behalf, or from a notice sent to an address you had already left — the hearing may be the place to argue the number and not just the collection of it. Whether a notice of deficiency was issued, and where it was sent, is on your account rather than on your letter.
Publication 1660 puts it more strongly than most summaries do: "Unless one of the exceptions in section 6330(f) applies, for Jeopardy situations, State Income Tax levies, Federal Contractor levies or Disqualified Employment Tax levies, levy action is not permitted for the subject tax and periods during the 30 days after the levy notice and during the timely requested CDP hearing process."
Not "normally there will be none" — not permitted. The exceptions in that opening clause are narrow, and the one most likely to reach an ordinary reader is the state tax refund: a timely request does not bar the IRS from levying a state refund for the same tax and period.
Now the cost, because it is real and it is almost never mentioned. Pub 1660 also says: "If your request for a CDP hearing is timely, the 10-year period the IRS has to collect your taxes will be suspended until the date Appeals' determination becomes final or you withdraw your request for a hearing in writing."
The IRS generally has ten years from assessment to collect. Requesting a hearing pauses that clock. For most people that is a good trade — a pause on a ten-year period in exchange for a stop on a levy next month is not a close call. But it is a trade, and if your balance is old and the ten years is closer to running out than you realize, it is a trade you should make deliberately rather than by reflex. Anyone who recommends a CDP hearing without telling you this has described half of it.
If the 30 days has already gone
There is a second door and it is smaller. If your request is late, you can ask for an equivalent hearing instead. It is requested on the same form, Form 12153, which covers both requests.
Pub 1660: the request "must be postmarked on or before the end of the one-year period after the date of the levy notice."
Three things are different about it, and all three matter:
| CDP hearing | Equivalent hearing |
|---|---|
Levy action Not permitted during the 30 days and during the hearing, unless a narrow statutory exception applies | Not prohibited. Appeals may ask for a hold; nothing obliges it |
Suspends the collection period Yes | No |
Can be taken to Tax Court Yes | No — "You cannot go to court if you disagree with Appeals' decision" |
So an equivalent hearing gets you a conversation with Appeals and, in practice, no protection while you have it. That is worth having. It is not what you would have had, and a page that offered it as a second chance without those three lines would be telling you a closed door was still open.

