What a CP90C is
A CP90C is notice that the IRS has levied your assets, together with your right to a hearing about it. The IRS's own description: “We levied your assets for unpaid taxes and are informing you of your right to a Collection Due Process hearing.” The letter itself opens: “We have issued a notice of seizure (levy) to collect your unpaid federal taxes.”
The Taxpayer Advocate Service lists it under the title Final Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Hearing, among the notices carrying Collection Due Process rights. The printed heading on the letter is blunter: Notice of seizure and notice of your right to a hearing.
Both halves are the notice. The first is history. The second is live.
Why no warning came first
This is the part that feels wrong, and there is an actual answer rather than a shrug.
Section 6330(a) of the tax code says no levy may be made until the IRS has notified you in writing of your right to a hearing, at least 30 days beforehand. That rule is why the whole Final Notice family exists.
Section 6330(f) then lists four situations where it does not apply: where the IRS has found that collection of the tax is in jeopardy; where it has served a levy on a State to collect a federal liability from a state tax refund; where it has served a disqualified employment tax levy; and where it has served a federal contractor levy.
| Exception | What it covers |
|---|---|
| 6330(f)(1) | Jeopardy — the IRS has found that collection of the tax is in jeopardy. |
| 6330(f)(2) | State tax refund levy — a levy on a State to collect a federal liability from a state tax refund. |
| 6330(f)(3) | Disqualified employment tax levy — a specific, narrowly defined carve-out. |
| 6330(f)(4) | Federal contractor levy — the exception the IRS publishes for a CP90C in plain English. |
Your CP90C may say which one applied to you. The specimen the IRS publishes names the fourth in plain English: “Because you are a federal contractor, you were not given the right to a pre-levy hearing. However, you can appeal the seizure (levy) of your assets by requesting a Collection Due Process hearing (Internal Revenue Code Section 6330).”
That sentence is the whole architecture in two lines, and it is worth taking at face value. The same subsection that removed the warning requires that you “be given the opportunity for the hearing described in this section within a reasonable period of time after the levy.” The right was not taken away. It was moved to the other side of the levy — and this letter is the delivery of it.
Your letter may name which exception applied to you, and it is worth reading for it. The only reason the IRS publishes for a CP90C is the federal contractor one, quoted above. Within the automated federal payment levy program, the other exceptions carry their own codes — a CP297A after a disqualified employment tax levy, a CP92 or CP242 for a state tax refund, a Letter 2439 for a jeopardy levy — so a CP90C most often means the contractor limb.
If your letter names a reason that does not match your circumstances — if it says federal contractor and you are not one and never have been — that is a discrete, checkable fact about your account and it is worth raising. We are not going to tell you it outranks everything else here, because which argument is strongest depends on what was taken and when.
Sources: IRS, “Understanding your CP90C notice” and Notice CP90C; Taxpayer Advocate Service; 26 U.S.C. §6330(a) and (f). Reviewed 5 September 2026.
Your clock
You have 30 days from the date printed on the notice, and you request the hearing on Form 12153.
The regulation says so for this letter in the same breath as it says so for the pre-levy ones: “A taxpayer is entitled to one CDP hearing with respect to the unpaid tax and tax periods covered by the pre-levy or post-levy CDP Notice provided to the taxpayer. The taxpayer must request the CDP hearing within the 30-day period commencing on the day after the date of the CDP Notice.” The specimen prints the resulting date on the letter — a notice dated 23 January carries a deadline of 22 February.
Counted from the date on the letter, not from the day it reached you. The same regulation states that actual receipt is not a prerequisite: a notice properly sent to your last known address starts the clock.
One phrase is easy to misread in your own favor. Section 6330(f) says the hearing must be offered “within a reasonable period of time after the levy.” That is the IRS's deadline to offer you the hearing. It is not your deadline to ask for one. Yours is the 30 days above, and it is printed on your letter.
The faster question: can the levy be released
A hearing is a process. A release is a request, and on a levy that has already taken money it is usually the more urgent of the two. They are not alternatives — make both.
Section 6343 requires the IRS to release a levy where any of these is true:
| Ground | In the IRS's own words |
|---|---|
| The balance is paid | "You paid the amount you owe" |
| The collection period had already run | "The period for collection ended prior to the levy being issued" |
| Release helps you pay | "Releasing the levy will help you pay your taxes" |
| An installment agreement | "You enter into an Installment Agreement and the terms of the agreement don't allow for the levy to continue" |
| Economic hardship | "The levy creates an economic hardship, meaning the IRS has determined the levy prevents you from meeting basic, reasonable living expenses" |
| The property is worth more than the debt | "The value of the property is more than the amount owed and releasing the levy will not hinder our ability to collect the amount owed" |
On hardship the IRS draws a distinction in two consecutive sentences, and the difference between them is the difference between a right and a request: “If the levy on your wages is creating an immediate economic hardship, the levy must be released. If the levy on your bank account or other account is creating an immediate economic hardship, the levy may be released.”
Must, and may. A wage levy causing genuine hardship has to go. A bank levy causing the same hardship is a decision someone makes.
There is also a narrower remedy for money already gone. Section 6343(d) allows property that has been levied to be returned where the levy was premature or did not follow the IRS's own administrative procedures, where an installment agreement exists, where return would facilitate collection, or where the National Taxpayer Advocate determines it. That is a later and harder request than a release, and the two should not be described as the same thing.
And the IRS's own caveat, which belongs here rather than in small print: “The release of a levy does not mean you don't have to pay the balance due. You must still make arrangements with the IRS to resolve your tax debt or a levy may be reissued.”
The 30-Day Levy Response Checklist
What to pull, what to confirm, and the order to do it in when a levy has already landed. It asks for a first name and an email address. These sheets carry dated figures, and the list is how a correction reaches you when one of them changes.
If the money is still inside the 21 days, that is the call to make today. (800) 236-3741, or Book thirty minutes →. We can tell you which of the four arguments you have before you spend a day on the wrong one.

