What a Letter 692 is — and the split that decides what it means
It is the letter an examiner sends after considering something you submitted. Beyond that, the two examination programs use it differently, and the difference matters more than anything else on this page.
If your audit was conducted in person — office or field examination
The governing instruction is in IRM 4.10.8, in the table covering what happens when additional information arrives after a 30-day letter:
“The taxpayer provides additional information that does not change the examination report, or / The corrected report reduces the previous report and no new issues are raised → Solicit an agreement. The following letters may be used, as applicable: Letter 692, Request for Consideration of Additional Findings, or Letter 692-A, Request for Consideration of Additional Findings (Claim), or Letter 692-B, Request for Consideration of Additional Findings (No-Change with Adjustments). Letter 692-K, Request for Consideration of Additional Findings (Bankruptcy). Allow the taxpayer 15 days to respond. A new 30-day letter is not needed.” — IRM 4.10.8.12.9.1 (04-10-2023), Additional Information Received
And the row beneath it, which is what gives the letter its meaning:
“The corrected report raises new issue(s), or / The proposed deficiency is increased → A new 30-day letter must be issued if sufficient time remains on the statute of limitations. If sufficient time does not remain on the statute of limitations, follow the instructions in IRM 4.10.8.12.1(4), 30-Day Letters.”
Read the two rows together and the letter starts to say something — in this program. The examiner had two paths. The one that produces a Letter 692 here is the one where the number did not increase and no new issue was raised. A revised report that went the other way calls for a new 30-day letter instead, and only where enough time remains on the assessment statute; where it does not, the manual sends the examiner down the Letter 5153 route instead.
If your audit was conducted by mail — correspondence examination
A different section of the manual governs, and it does not support the same reading. IRM 4.19.13:
“The Letter 692-M, Request for Consideration of Additional Findings (Manual Letter), providing the taxpayer with a response/determination on submitted documents, may be mailed prior to the suspense period end date of an ICL or a 30-day letter. A manually prepared Statutory Notice of Deficiency may be mailed no earlier than the 31st day following a Letter 692-M.” “Taxpayer requests correction with no remittance → Issue Letter 692-M or Letter 692-T, Request for Information on Additional Findings, and revised report, if necessary.” — IRM 4.19.13, correspondence examination
The same section's suspense table lists the Letter 692-M plainly as the “15-day letter with report.”
So in a mail audit this letter is a determination on what you sent, and it can be a step on the way to a 90-day letter rather than a sign that the number held. A page that told you otherwise would be comforting and wrong.
There is no IRS “Understanding your Letter 692” page — we checked, alongside Letters 525, 531, 566, 915 and 3219, against seven notices that do have pages. This page is built from both manual sections and from the IRS's Appeals and audit-reconsideration guidance.
What the letter does and does not tell you
Start with the suffix, because it decides the rest. A bare 692, or 692-A, 692-B or 692-K, belongs to the office and field examination program. A 692-M or 692-T belongs to the correspondence program.
| Suffix | Program | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| 692 | Office / field examination | Additional information did not change the report. |
| 692-A | Office / field examination | Request for Consideration of Additional Findings (Claim). |
| 692-B | Office / field examination | No-change with adjustments (affecting other years). |
| 692-K | Office / field examination | Bankruptcy in the picture. |
| 692-M | Correspondence examination | The “15-day letter with report” — a determination on your submitted documents. A Statutory Notice of Deficiency may follow from the 31st day. |
| 692-T | Correspondence examination | Request for Information on Additional Findings — the secure-messaging version. |
On an office or field examination, the first of the two situations is “additional information that does not change the examination report” — the examiner read what you sent and kept the number. The dispute is narrower, because you know your evidence was considered, but the proposal is where it was. The second is “the corrected report reduces the previous report and no new issues are raised”, which is a genuine improvement whose size is on the enclosed report rather than in the letter. What those two have in common is that the number did not go up.
On a correspondence examination, that inference does not hold, and the enclosed report is the only thing that tells you where you stand.
A check you can run yourself. IRM 4.10.8 records that a Letter 692 “is signed by the examiner”, while 30-day letters “must be signed by the group manager.” If the signature block is the examiner's, you are not looking at a new 30-day letter.
If the suffix on your letter is an -M or a -T, a notice of deficiency can follow it from the 31st day. That is worth thirty minutes now rather than after. (800) 236-3741 · Book thirty minutes →
Your clock
The date on your letter, and it is likely to be shorter than the last one.
IRM 4.10.8 instructs the examiner to “Allow the taxpayer 15 days to respond.” IRM 4.19.13 lists the correspondence version as the “15-day letter with report.” Both are internal instructions about how long to leave a case before moving it on. Neither is a period the law gives you and neither is a right. They are stated here because they explain what you are likely to see printed, not so that anyone works to them.
And on a mail audit there is a second number worth knowing, because it is the one with teeth. IRM 4.19.13 provides that a Statutory Notice of Deficiency “may be mailed no earlier than the 31st day following a Letter 692-M.” That is not your deadline either — it is the earliest the IRS may move — but it tells you how short the runway is.
The sentence beside it is the one with consequences. “A new 30-day letter is not needed.”
What that does establish, for an office or field examination: nothing about a Letter 692 opens a fresh Appeals window. IRM 4.10.8 is explicit that the examiner does not issue a new 30-day letter in that situation.
What it does not establish, and this page will not claim otherwise: whether your Appeals window is still open. That depends on the date of the earlier letter that offered Appeals and on what has happened since. It is a fact about your dates, and this page cannot see them.
What is worth doing about that. If a 30-day letter was issued earlier and you have not requested an Appeals conference, the general rule is that the request goes in within 30 days of the date of that letter — “Generally, the time limit is 30 days from the date of the letter” — and it goes to the IRS office named in the letter, not to Appeals. If those 30 days are still running, this revised report has not changed that and the clock has not restarted.
Sources: IRM 4.10.8.12.9.1 and 4.10.8.12.1 (04-10-2023); IRS, “Preparing a request for appeals.” Read 6 September 2026.
Can they take my wages or my bank account over this?
Not while this is still a proposal. Section 6213(a) bars assessment of the proposed deficiency, and any levy or collection suit for it, until a Notice of Deficiency has been mailed and its 90 days — 150 if it is addressed to you outside the United States — have run, and until any Tax Court case is finished.
This page is about a letter asking you to agree, so the limit matters more here than usual. Under 6213(d) you may waive those restrictions in writing, and signing the revised report is that waiver. Where the revised number is right, signing is the sensible end of the matter — and it is also the point at which the protection stops and the balance becomes collectible.
The statute's other exceptions are at sections 6851, 6852 and 6861, and a math or clerical error assessment is outside the bar under 6213(b)(1). A balance already assessed for another year is unaffected either way.
What triggered it
You, or your representative, sent the examiner something after a report had already been proposed. The manual's own heading for the section is “Additional Information Received.”
That could be documents, an explanation, an amended computation, or a claim. Where the material is a claim, the letter may arrive as a 692-A. Where the outcome is a no-change with adjustments affecting other years, a 692-B. Where there is a bankruptcy in the picture, a 692-K.
What happens if you do nothing
The examiner treats the case as unagreed and closes it forward. A Letter 692 solicits an agreement; declining to give one is a legitimate answer and it is not the same as ignoring the letter, but only one of those two gets your position recorded.
Where a case closes unagreed, the route runs to a Notice of Deficiency — a Letter 531 after an in-person audit, a Letter 3219 after one by mail — carrying 90 days to petition the United States Tax Court. On a mail audit that notice can follow a Letter 692-M from the 31st day. What that notice is and what the 90 days is for →
And the reason to answer even where you agree. Signing a revised report that reduces the proposed tax closes the matter at the lower number. Doing nothing does not preserve the lower number; it leaves the case to be closed by someone else.
What to do in the next two weeks
1. Today: compare the revised report against the original, line by line. Not the totals — the lines. The manual's two situations look identical from the front page and completely different on the schedule of adjustments. The question you are answering is: did anything move, and which item?
2. Check that what you sent is reflected in the reasoning. If an item you substantiated is still disallowed, the explanation should say why. If it does not, that is a question worth asking before you sign anything.
3. Work out what is still in dispute, and whether it is worth continuing. A revised report often leaves one or two items standing out of a longer list. The decision is different when the argument has narrowed.
4. Establish whether an Appeals window is still open, from the earlier letter's date. This letter did not open one and did not restart one.
5. Answer by the date, either way. Agreement or disagreement both count as responses. Silence is the only one that does not.
The genuinely difficult part is step 1 — reading a revised Form 4549 against the original and identifying which adjustments changed and which explanations were rewritten. Two versions of a report look alike and the differences are the whole message. It is also the part most easily done by someone who reads these documents regularly, because the thing you are looking for is a change in an explanation rather than a change in a number.

